These are ready-to-open issue ideas that make the repo feel alive, intentional, and contributor-friendly.
Why it matters:
- closes the biggest remaining evidence gap
- strengthens release credibility immediately
Suggested scope:
- capture a real Android device evidence set using
docs/evidence/DEVICE-CAPTURE-CHECKLIST.md - include device model, Android version, and WebView version
- link the result from the next release notes
Labels:
docshelp wanted
Why it matters:
- upstream UI drift is a realistic long-term risk
- this is a good contributor-sized reliability issue
Suggested scope:
- review the current selector strategy in
MainActivity.java - reduce brittle assumptions where possible
- keep fallback placement behavior documented
Labels:
androidgood first issue
Why it matters:
- the PWA path has automated proxy coverage but still needs real-device proof
- iOS-specific install and safe-area behavior should be checked on hardware
Suggested scope:
- install the PWA on a real iPhone or iPad
- capture connection, launch-from-home-screen, and proxy health evidence
- update
IPHONE-GUIDE.mdif device behavior differs from the current notes
Labels:
docshelp wanted
Why it matters:
- the repo is now engineering-credible
- the next unlock is shareability and fast comprehension
Suggested scope:
- record a short clip covering connect, pair, chat, upload, and cert-blocking
- export a GitHub-friendly asset and link it from the next release
Labels:
communitydocs
Why it matters:
- Android update trust depends on stable signing identity
- signing continuity is the highest-risk release operations gap
Suggested scope:
- document the intended public release signing fingerprint
- add a release-time manual verification step for signer continuity
- keep private signing material out of the repo
Labels:
androidsecurity