Repository navigation
[workflow-analysis] Weekly Workflow Analysis — 2026-10-05: Issue Monster failing 100%, plus a cross-workflow burst incident 04:52–06:07 UTC #65831
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-10-06T09:53:43.686Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Overview
Sampled the most recent ~6 hours of GitHub Actions run history for this repo (2026-10-05 03:46–09:46 UTC, 400 runs) via the GitHub MCP server, after the
agenticworkflows logsbulk sweep across all 320 workflows repeatedly stalled (20+ min with no progress — see Methodology note below). The headline finding is a sharp, time-boxed reliability incident, plus one workflow with a 100%-failure root cause unrelated to that incident.Key metrics
04:51:28on the same PR branch), which points to a shared infrastructure blip (runner contention / MCP gateway hiccup) rather than independent per-workflow bugs.http_400_response_error,exitCode=1, "Agent reported that it could not complete the task" (infrastructure_error). This is a distinct, ongoing root cause — not part of the burst — and affects every single run, all day. It shares its inference engine (pi) with "AI Moderator", which also appears repeatedly in the failure list.copilot/fix-*PR branches for workflows like "Agentic Commands" and "AI Moderator" — consistent with GitHub's approval gate for externally-authored/first-run workflow executions, not a code defect. Worth excluding from failure-rate alerting to avoid overcounting.Next actions
pi) — investigate the HTTP 400 from its inference call (likely a bad/deprecated model id, malformed request, or auth issue); it has failed every run today and is burning compute for zero output.piengine and shows a similar failure signature.action_requiredfrom failure-rate dashboards, or split it out separately fromfailure/startup_failure, since a large share reflects expected approval-gating on Copilot-authored PR branches.gpt-4.1-miniorclaude-haiku-4-5to cut cost.View Details — methodology and raw evidence
gh aw status), spanning engines: copilot (130), codex (77), claude (58), pi (32), aider (4), goose (4), opencode (3), crush (2), cursor (2), deepseek-harness (2), gemini (2), kiro (2), pydantic-ai (2).agenticworkflows logs --start_date -1wsweep across all workflows was attempted twice (with and without an outer timeout) and did not complete after 20+ minutes each time — likely too expensive given the workflow count and per-run log/artifact volume. Pivoted to the GitHub Actions REST API via the read-only GitHub MCP server instead.status=failure-filtered run list showed a cluster of 100 failures in the most recent ~9 hours, then jumped straight to a cluster from 2026-02-18/19/20 on the next page — a 7+ month gap. This is not a confirmed "zero failures for 7 months" claim; it may reflect API pagination/caching behavior (total_countappeared capped at 2500) as much as true history, so it's reported here only as a caveat, not a finding.copilot/fix-linter-flags-omission): §37265294850 (Agentic Commands, failure) and run 37265294729 (AI Moderator, failure), bothcreated_at: 2026-10-05T04:51:28Z.agenticworkflows logs) is the one that stalled; worth a follow-up with a narrower per-workflow query (e.g.workflow_name+ smallcount) rather than a repo-wide sweep.References:
All reactions