Skip to content

Latest commit

Β 

History

History
177 lines (139 loc) Β· 6.24 KB

speech-structure-patterns.md

File metadata and controls

177 lines (139 loc) Β· 6.24 KB

Speech Structure Patterns

Proven speech architecture patterns. Select and adapt based on event type, duration, and objectives.

Foundational Principle: The McKinsey Pyramid (Minto Pyramid Principle)

All patterns below should be layered on top of the Pyramid Principle:

                    β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                    β”‚  Key Message β”‚   ← Audience hears this FIRST
                    β”‚  (So What?)  β”‚
                    β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
               β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
          β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β–Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β–Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β–Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”
          β”‚ Pillar 1β”‚ β”‚ Pillar 2β”‚ β”‚ Pillar 3β”‚   ← MECE supporting arguments
          β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
           β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”   β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”   β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”
           β”‚Evidenceβ”‚   β”‚Evidenceβ”‚   β”‚Evidenceβ”‚   ← Data, stories, proof points
           β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜   β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜   β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜

How to apply:

  1. Start with the answer: State your conclusion/recommendation at the top. Don't make the audience wait.
  2. Group arguments MECE: Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive β€” no overlaps, no gaps.
  3. SCR opening: Use Situation–Complication–Resolution as the intro frame:
    • Situation: Shared context the audience agrees with
    • Complication: What changed, what's at stake, what's the tension
    • Resolution: Your key message (= the pyramid apex)
  4. Vertical logic: Each layer answers "why?" or "how?" from the layer above.
  5. Horizontal logic: Points within a group follow deductive (premise β†’ conclusion) or inductive (facts β†’ pattern β†’ insight) order.

Rule: Every section of the speech should be traceable upward to the apex message. If a section doesn't support the key message, cut it.

Pattern 1: The Executive Briefing (20-60 min)

Best for: client meetings, partner exchanges, board presentations.

Opening (10%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Welcome & introductions
β”œβ”€β”€ Frame expectations ("What today is / is not")
β”œβ”€β”€ Pose 2-3 questions the audience is likely thinking
└── Promise to address them with facts

Body β€” 3 themed chapters (70%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Chapter 1: Context & Credibility
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ Who you are (beyond the label)
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ Track record / proof points
β”‚   └── Transition: "Now that you know who we are..."
β”œβ”€β”€ Chapter 2: Market/Domain Insights
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ Data-driven observations
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ Counterintuitive findings
β”‚   └── Transition: "So what does this mean for you?"
└── Chapter 3: Solution / Framework / Proposal
    β”œβ”€β”€ Your approach / framework
    β”œβ”€β”€ Honest about challenges
    └── What makes this different

Synthesis & Close (20%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Recap via the 3 opening questions
β”œβ”€β”€ 3 key observations (not promises)
β”œβ”€β”€ Call to action / next steps
└── Open discussion

Pattern 2: The Keynote / Thought Leadership (15-45 min)

Best for: conferences, industry events, public speaking.

Hook (5%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Provocative question, statistic, or story
└── "Here's what I want to explore with you today"

Thesis (5%)
β”œβ”€β”€ One-sentence core argument
└── Roadmap: "Three ideas / observations / lessons"

Body β€” 3 ideas (70%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Idea 1: Setup β†’ Evidence β†’ Insight β†’ Transition
β”œβ”€β”€ Idea 2: Setup β†’ Evidence β†’ Insight β†’ Transition
└── Idea 3: Setup β†’ Evidence β†’ Insight β†’ Transition

Synthesis (15%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Thread the 3 ideas together
β”œβ”€β”€ Return to opening hook
└── Forward-looking statement

Close (5%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Memorable final line
└── Thank you / Q&A invitation

Pattern 3: The Pitch / Proposal (10-30 min)

Best for: sales meetings, fundraising, partnership proposals.

Problem (20%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Describe the pain point β€” use their language
β”œβ”€β”€ Data showing magnitude
└── "Here's what we've observed..."

Solution (40%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Your approach (not product features)
β”œβ”€β”€ Why this approach works (evidence)
β”œβ”€β”€ Differentiation (honest comparison)
└── Case study / proof point

Proposition (30%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Specific next steps
β”œβ”€β”€ Timeline and resources
β”œβ”€β”€ Risk mitigation
└── ROI framework

Close (10%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Recap problem β†’ solution β†’ proposition
β”œβ”€β”€ Clear ask
└── Open for questions

Pattern 4: The Workshop / Interactive Session (60-120 min)

Best for: training, co-creation sessions, strategy workshops.

Framing (10%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Today's objective
β”œβ”€β”€ Ground rules
└── Agenda overview

Input Phase (30%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Present framework / content / data
β”œβ”€β”€ Check understanding along the way
└── Pause for questions

Interactive Phase (40%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Exercise / discussion / breakout
β”œβ”€β”€ Facilitate, don't lecture
└── Synthesize group outputs

Wrap-up (20%)
β”œβ”€β”€ Key takeaways
β”œβ”€β”€ Action items
β”œβ”€β”€ Next steps
└── Feedback collection

Pacing Guidelines

Duration Words (approx) Slides (approx) Sections
10 min 1,200-1,500 5-8 2-3
20 min 2,400-3,000 10-15 3-4
30 min 3,600-4,500 15-22 4-5
45 min 5,400-6,500 22-35 5-7
60 min 7,000-8,500 30-42 6-8

Rule of thumb: ~130-150 spoken words per minute. Leave 15-20% buffer for pauses, emphasis, and audience reactions.

Per-Slide Timing Formula

For a given number of slides and total time:

  • time_per_slide = total_minutes / num_slides
  • Chapter dividers: 0 min (transition only)
  • Data-heavy slides: 1.5-2x average
  • Summary slides: 0.5-1x average

Transition Techniques

  1. Question bridge: "So the next question is..." / "You might be wondering..."
  2. Callback bridge: "Remember when I mentioned X? Here's why it matters."
  3. Contrast bridge: "That was the theory. Now let's look at reality."
  4. Preview bridge: "There are three parts to this. We've covered the first..."
  5. Story bridge: "Let me illustrate with a specific example."