Duplicated cmake config files

[nicowrobel]

Currently, the Isaac library hosts two versions of the cmake version file (ISAACConfigVersion.cmake and a .in version) and the base dir file.

Both versions include the same content, the .cmake just replaces some placeholders that else would be filled in during compilation. I assume, this is done to let the included example use these files directly form the source without compiling the library.

Should we remove the .cmake files, so that we don't have to update the same code twice? It's not much code, so maybe the benefits outweigh the problems that might arise with duplicate code, but I still wanted to start the discussion.

[PrometheusPi]

I agree, if this is mostly code duplication, it should be removed if possible.
What's your opinion @psychocoderHPC?

[psychocoderHPC]

My CMake knowledge is not enough to say what the right way is. The *.in file is somehow used when installing a project or if you use fetch content, but I never looked up what it the right way or best practice.