fix(security): fail closed on missing conversion-job authority - #348
Open
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
fix(security): fail closed on missing conversion-job authority#348seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough
Changes권한 메타데이터 검증
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1📝 Generate docstrings 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
seonghobae
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 10, 2026 16:24
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Objective
Advance #317 with a path-disjoint production security slice: the explicit tenant-aware
ConversionJobconstructor must not silently replace absent tenant/subject authority withbuyer-demoidentities.Test-first state
This Draft is intentionally at a RED test-only head.
ConversionJobTenantAuthorityTestrequires null or blank-after-NUL-removal tenant/subject claims to fail closed with controlled errors. Protected main currently falls back to demo authority, so CI is expected to fail until the narrow model boundary is corrected.Scope
This slice touches only the conversion-job authority model and its focused regression. It does not edit active
viewer.js,demo.js,dom-utils.js,ViewerUiController, repository/lifecycle, credential, OIDC, Office-conversion, or canonical-document writer paths. Legacy demo convenience constructors remain explicit development compatibility surfaces; this PR changes only the constructor whose signature claims that tenant and subject authority were supplied.Acceptance
RED -> smallest production fix -> exact-head
mvn verify/100% owned coverage/public Javadocs -> CI/Security Scan/SAST/fuzz -> review/thread refetch. Keep Draft until GREEN exact-head evidence exists; independent write-authorized approval remains a separate merge gate.Summary by CodeRabbit