Vault is ambiguous how to store user names and passwords. I see two options:
A)
| Name |
Value |
| Username |
<Username> |
| Password |
<Password> |
B)
| Name |
Value |
<Username> |
<Password> |
I see this ambiguity as problematic because:
- When sharing several vaults and secrets in larger teams, inconsistency could cause users to interpret and use the stored secrets differently, causing problems
- If in the future a browser add-on would automatically fill forms, that need to be consistent.
From @fkantelberg I understand that option A was intended. But in this case a good UX lacks:
- For column "Name" use (configurable) drop down entries instead of free text. (see Nextcloud's password manager)
- Support different field types so that for example the user name is not hidden but shown in clear text
- Even better: add a static user name field to the top (next to name and URL)
For option B a good UX lacks:
- All of option A
- a Copy button at the column "Name" to copy the user name.
Which of these two options do you use? What do you think of the suggested improvements?
Vault is ambiguous how to store user names and passwords. I see two options:
A)
<Username><Password>B)
<Username><Password>I see this ambiguity as problematic because:
From @fkantelberg I understand that option A was intended. But in this case a good UX lacks:
For option B a good UX lacks:
Which of these two options do you use? What do you think of the suggested improvements?