Skip to content

feat(provider): Add Google GCP support - #1131

Open
Prajna1999 wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
feat/google-gcp-credential-reg-and-provider
Open

feat(provider): Add Google GCP support#1131
Prajna1999 wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
feat/google-gcp-credential-reg-and-provider

Conversation

@Prajna1999

@Prajna1999 Prajna1999 commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes #1149

Summary

  • Before: No support for Google GCP as a provider.
  • Now: Added Google GCP as a provider for credential registration.
  • Implemented provider logic.
  • Updated integration tests.

Checklist

Before submitting a pull request, please ensure that you mark these task.

  • Ran fastapi run --reload app/main.py or docker compose up in the repository root and test.
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that is tested and has test cases.

Notes

Please add here if any other information is required for the reviewer.

Original PR description

Issue

Closes #PLEASE_TYPE_ISSUE_NUMBER

Summary

Explain the motivation for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve?

Checklist

Before submitting a pull request, please ensure that you mark these task.

  • Ran fastapi run --reload app/main.py or docker compose up in the repository root and test.
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that is tested and has test cases.

Notes

Please add here if any other information is required for the reviewer.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🏷️ Required labels (at least one) (1)
  • ready-for-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6d7845a6-c0fa-43f7-a05a-eca6f7934156

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions github-actions Bot changed the title feat: add google-gcp as provider feat(provider): Add Google GCP support Aug 17, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

OpenAPI changes   🔴 6 breaking changes

Caution

Downstream consumers may need an update before merging.

Breaking changes  ·  6
Method Path Change
🔴 GET /api/v1/models added the new google-gcp enum value to the data/anyOf[subschema #1: ModelConfigListPublic]/data/items/provider response property for the response status 200
🔴 PATCH /api/v1/models added the new google-gcp enum value to the data/anyOf[subschema #1]/items/provider response property for the response status 200
🔴 POST /api/v1/models added the new google-gcp enum value to the data/anyOf[subschema #1]/items/provider response property for the response status 201
🔴 GET /api/v1/models/grouped added the new google-gcp enum value to the data/anyOf[subschema #1]/additionalProperties/items/provider response property for the response status 200
🔴 GET /api/v1/models/{provider}/{model_name} added the new google-gcp enum value to the data/anyOf[subschema #1: ModelConfigPublic]/provider response property for the response status 200
🔴 PATCH /api/v1/models/{provider}/{model_name} added the new google-gcp enum value to the data/anyOf[subschema #1: ModelConfigPublic]/provider response property for the response status 200
Full changelog  ·  21
Method Path Change
🔴 GET /api/v1/models added the new google-gcp enum value to the data/anyOf[subschema #1: ModelConfigListPublic]/data/items/provider response property for the response status 200
🔴 PATCH /api/v1/models added the new google-gcp enum value to the data/anyOf[subschema #1]/items/provider response property for the response status 200
🔴 POST /api/v1/models added the new google-gcp enum value to the data/anyOf[subschema #1]/items/provider response property for the response status 201
🔴 GET /api/v1/models/grouped added the new google-gcp enum value to the data/anyOf[subschema #1]/additionalProperties/items/provider response property for the response status 200
🔴 GET /api/v1/models/{provider}/{model_name} added the new google-gcp enum value to the data/anyOf[subschema #1: ModelConfigPublic]/provider response property for the response status 200
🔴 PATCH /api/v1/models/{provider}/{model_name} added the new google-gcp enum value to the data/anyOf[subschema #1: ModelConfigPublic]/provider response property for the response status 200
🟢 POST /api/v1/configs added the new google-gcp enum value to the request property config_blob/completion/anyOf[subschema #2: KaapiCompletionConfig]/provider/anyOf[subschema #1]/
🟢 POST /api/v1/configs added the new google-gcp-native enum value to the request property config_blob/completion/anyOf[subschema #1: NativeCompletionConfig]/provider
🟢 POST /api/v1/llm/call added the new google-gcp enum value to the request property config/blob/anyOf[subschema #1: ConfigBlob]/completion/anyOf[subschema #2: KaapiCompletionConfig]/provider/anyOf[subschema #1]/
🟢 POST /api/v1/llm/call added the new google-gcp-native enum value to the request property config/blob/anyOf[subschema #1: ConfigBlob]/completion/anyOf[subschema #1: NativeCompletionConfig]/provider
🟢 POST /api/v1/llm/chain added the new google-gcp enum value to the request property blocks/items/config/blob/anyOf[subschema #1: ConfigBlob]/completion/anyOf[subschema #2: KaapiCompletionConfig]/provider/anyOf[subschema #1]/
🟢 POST /api/v1/llm/chain added the new google-gcp-native enum value to the request property blocks/items/config/blob/anyOf[subschema #1: ConfigBlob]/completion/anyOf[subschema #1: NativeCompletionConfig]/provider
🟢 POST /api/v1/llm/chain/sts added the new google-gcp enum value to the request property stt_provider/anyOf[subschema #1]/
🟢 POST /api/v1/llm/chain/sts added the new google-gcp enum value to the request property tts_provider/anyOf[subschema #1]/
🟢 GET /api/v1/models added the enum value google-gcp to the property anyOf[subschema #1: Provider]/ of the query request parameter provider
🟢 PATCH /api/v1/models added the new google-gcp enum value to the request property items/provider
🟢 POST /api/v1/models added the new google-gcp enum value to the request property anyOf[subschema #1: ModelConfigCreate]/provider
🟢 POST /api/v1/models added the new google-gcp enum value to the request property anyOf[subschema #2]/items/provider
🟢 DELETE /api/v1/models/{provider}/{model_name} added the new enum value google-gcp to the path request parameter provider
🟢 GET /api/v1/models/{provider}/{model_name} added the new enum value google-gcp to the path request parameter provider
🟢 PATCH /api/v1/models/{provider}/{model_name} added the new enum value google-gcp to the path request parameter provider

maind7392564 · generated by oasdiff

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.23810% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
backend/app/services/llm/mappers.py 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@vprashrex
vprashrex force-pushed the feat/google-gcp-credential-reg-and-provider branch from 80adb81 to 9f55b91 Compare August 19, 2026 05:01
@Prajna1999 Prajna1999 linked an issue Aug 20, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@Prajna1999
Prajna1999 requested review from AkhileshNegi and vprashrex and removed request for AkhileshNegi August 20, 2026 15:48
@Prajna1999 Prajna1999 self-assigned this Aug 20, 2026
@Prajna1999
Prajna1999 requested review from AkhileshNegi and Ayush8923 and removed request for vprashrex August 20, 2026 16:34
@Prajna1999
Prajna1999 requested review from vprashrex and removed request for Ayush8923 August 20, 2026 16:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

google-gcp: Dedicated Pydantic model

1 participant