Skip to content

test(core/txpool/legacypool): drop shared config writes from parallel tests - #2517

Open
gzliudan wants to merge 1 commit into
XinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:fix-legacypool-test-race
Open

test(core/txpool/legacypool): drop shared config writes from parallel tests#2517
gzliudan wants to merge 1 commit into
XinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:fix-legacypool-test-race

Conversation

@gzliudan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Proposed changes

TestQueueAccountLimiting and TestPendingLimiting both run with t.Parallel() and both assigned testTxPoolConfig.AccountQueue, a package-level variable that every other test reads while building its pool. That is a data race, and it can also change the limits another test is asserting against.

Neither test needs the global: their pools are already constructed before the assignment, so the value only ever served as the loop bound. Use a local accountQueue instead. Also fix the mismatched want value in the pending count error message, which printed AccountQueue+5 for an equality check against AccountQueue.

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
  • ci: Changes to CI configuration files and scripts
  • chore: Changes that don't change source code or tests
  • docs: Documentation only changes
  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • revert: Revert something
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Impacted Components

Which parts of the codebase does this PR touch?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Consensus
  • Account
  • Network
  • Geth
  • Smart Contract
  • External components
  • Not sure (Please specify below)

Checklist

Put an in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that

  • This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage
  • Tested on a private network from the genesis block and monitored the chain operating correctly for multiple epochs.
  • Provide an end-to-end test plan in the PR description on how to manually test it on the devnet/testnet.
  • Tested the backwards compatibility.
  • Tested with XDC nodes running this version co-exist with those running the previous version.
  • Relevant documentation has been updated as part of this PR
  • N/A

… tests

TestQueueAccountLimiting and TestPendingLimiting both run with t.Parallel()
and both assigned testTxPoolConfig.AccountQueue, a package-level variable that
every other test reads while building its pool. That is a data race, and it can
also change the limits another test is asserting against.

Neither test needs the global: their pools are already constructed before the
assignment, so the value only ever served as the loop bound. Use a local
accountQueue instead. Also fix the mismatched want value in the pending count
error message, which printed AccountQueue+5 for an equality check against
AccountQueue.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f08a0e9b-485e-4595-b754-3dd0571c3e84

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant