Skip to content

[Question] Is there a guideline for handling semanticIDs when a new submodel version is developed? #149

Description

@sebastiankb

Coming from the AID WG:

In AID 1.0 there where properties defined with semanticIds like:

https://admin-shell.io/idta/AssetInterfacesDescription/1/0/Interface

In AID 1.1, some definitions of the model have been expanded, but many property definitions from AID 1.0 remain unchanged. Should all untouched properties use the same semanticIDs as in AID 1.0, or should they be updated as follows:

https://admin-shell.io/idta/AssetInterfacesDescription/1/1/Interface

Is there a best practice or guideline available?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions