Skip to content

netty-incubator-codec-ohttp BinaryHttpParser: Unauthenticated CPU-exhaustion DoS via infinite loop in field-section decoding

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 18, 2026 in netty/netty-incubator-codec-ohttp • Updated Aug 20, 2026

Package

maven io.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp (Maven)

Affected versions

<= 0.0.22.Final

Patched versions

0.0.23.Final

Description

BinaryHttpParser: Unauthenticated CPU-exhaustion DoS via infinite loop in field-section decoding

  • ID: BHTTP-LOOP-001
  • Severity: High
  • CVSS v3.1: 7.5 — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • CWE: CWE-835 (Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition) — secondary CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption)
  • Affected component: codec-bhttp → io.netty.incubator.codec.bhttp.BinaryHttpParser#readFieldSection, file codec-bhttp/src/main/java/io/netty/incubator/codec/bhttp/BinaryHttpParser.java:619-626
  • Affected version: netty-incubator-codec-ohttp HEAD d3f2b49 (release 0.0.22.Final + 3 commits). The loop has existed since the parser was introduced and is present in the latest code; all published advisory fixes are already applied.
  • Reachable from: io.netty.incubator.codec.ohttp.OHttpRequestResponseContext$ContentDecoder#decodeChunk (codec-ohttp/.../OHttpRequestResponseContext.java:214), i.e. the auto-wired OHTTP server and client codecs.
  • Confidence: High (empirically reproduced hang + thread dump against the unmodified parser).

Summary

BinaryHttpParser decodes Binary HTTP (RFC 9292) messages. An OHTTP gateway/client built on this library feeds the decrypted OHTTP body straight into BinaryHttpParser.parse(...). The field-section decoding loop terminates only on the exact condition fieldSectionLength != 0 and relies on a Java assert to guarantee forward progress. Because (a) the loop counter can be driven negative and (b) readFieldLine(...) legitimately consumes zero bytes and returns null on a truncated/over-long field line, the loop can spin forever. Assertions are disabled in any normal production JVM, so the two assert statements meant to catch this provide no protection.

A single ~17-byte Binary HTTP message — encapsulated by an unauthenticated attacker inside a normal OHTTP request, using the gateway's public key configuration — pins one Netty event-loop thread at 100% CPU permanently. A handful of such requests exhausts the entire event-loop group and takes the OHTTP gateway (or client) fully offline.

Root cause

BinaryHttpParser.java:619-626:

HeaderType lastType = HeaderType.PSEUDO_HEADER;
while (fieldSectionLength != 0) {            // 619  — "!= 0", not "> 0"
    int readableBytes = in.readableBytes();
    lastType = readFieldLine(in, headers, lastType, trailers);
    assert lastType != null;                 // 622  — no-op without -ea
    int read = readableBytes - in.readableBytes();
    assert read > 0;                         // 624  — no-op without -ea
    fieldSectionLength -= read;              // 625
}

Two cooperating defects:

  1. Counter can never hit zero. fieldSectionLength is the declared field-section byte length read from the wire (line 592). The loop subtracts the bytes each readFieldLine actually consumes. If a field line consumes more bytes than the (attacker-understated) declared length, fieldSectionLength goes negative and != 0 stays true forever.

  2. Zero-progress iterations. readFieldLine (lines 654-707) returns null without consuming any bytes when the remaining buffer cannot hold a complete field line — at lines 656, 664, 670, and 681 (the in.skipBytes(sumBytes) that advances the reader is only reached on the success path, line 705). When it returns null, read == 0, fieldSectionLength is unchanged, and the loop re-enters with identical state — a tight busy spin.

The only constructs that would have stopped either case are the assert statements on lines 622 and 624, which the JVM strips unless started with -ea. Production deployments do not run with assertions enabled.

Reachability (hop-by-hop, every guard resolved)

Attacker model: OHTTP gateways publish their HPKE key configuration so that any client can encrypt requests to them. The attacker therefore encrypts a malicious BHTTP body under the gateway's public key — a perfectly valid OHTTP request. HPKE decapsulation succeeds; the plaintext is attacker-chosen.

  1. OHttpServerCodec.decode → OHttpRequestResponseContext.parse → chunk decode → ContentDecoder.decodeChunk.
  2. OHttpRequestResponseContext.java:211 decrypts the chunk into decryptedChunk; line 212 cumulates it; line 214 calls binaryHttpParser.parse(binaryHttpCumulation, completeBodyReceived) — attacker-controlled plaintext, no application code in between.
  3. parse → READ_KNOWN_LENGTH_REQUEST_HEAD → readRequestHead (line 190).
  4. readRequestHead reads the control data, then at lines 445-451 slices all remaining readable bytes as the field section and calls readFieldSection(..., knownLength=true, maxFieldSectionSize).
  5. Inside readFieldSection:
    • Guard checkFieldSectionTooLarge(fieldSectionLength, max) (line 607): bounds only the declared length, which the PoC sets to 1. Passes — not a barrier.
    • Guard in.readableBytes() < sumBytes (line 609): sumBytes is built from the declared length, also tiny. Passes — not a barrier.
    • Guards assert (lines 622, 624): no-ops in production. Defeated by default.
    • Loop entered → spins forever (defects 1 + 2).

No reachable guard bounds the actual consumption or forces progress. maxFieldSectionSize is irrelevant because the declared length is small and the loop is CPU-bound on a fixed, small buffer (no allocation, no memory growth to trip any size cap).

Proof of concept (executed locally, benign liveness oracle)

The real codec-bhttp sources were compiled unmodified against netty 4.1.135.Final (the version pinned in pom.xml). The harness builds a valid known-length BHTTP request whose declared field-section length (0x01) is understated relative to the actual field line, then calls parse(in, true) on a worker thread with a 6-second watchdog. No payload, no side effects — purely a timing/CPU oracle.

Malicious message (17 bytes):

00 01 67 01 68 01 61 01 70 01 01 61 01 62 01 63 01
│  └method g └scheme h └auth a └path p │  └hdr a:b──┘ └ partial line
└ framing 0 (known-length request)     └ declared field-section length = 1

Observed (production default, assertions OFF):

[*] malicious BHTTP bytes (17): 0001670168016101700101610162016301
[!!] HANG CONFIRMED: parse() still running after 6000 ms
[!!] worker thread CPU time: 6029 ms (≈100% of one core => busy spin)
[!!] worker stack (top frames):
        at io.netty.incubator.codec.bhttp.BinaryHttpParser.readFieldSection(BinaryHttpParser.java:626)
        at io.netty.incubator.codec.bhttp.BinaryHttpParser.readRequestHead(BinaryHttpParser.java:451)
        at io.netty.incubator.codec.bhttp.BinaryHttpParser.parse(BinaryHttpParser.java:190)

CPU time ≈ wall time ⇒ a busy spin (RUNNABLE), not a blocked wait.

Controls:

  • Same input with -ea: parse() throws AssertionError at readFieldSection:624 immediately — proving the assertion is the only would-be guard and is absent in production.
  • Well-formed request (declared length matches): parse() returns DefaultBinaryHttpRequest promptly — proving the harness does not hang on valid input.

PoC sources: findings/netty-incubator-codec-ohttp/raw/Poc.java (hang + control 1) and raw/Poc2.java (negative control).

Impact

Unauthenticated, pre-business-logic remote denial of service. Each malicious request permanently consumes one Netty event-loop thread at 100% CPU. Netty event-loop groups have a small fixed thread count (default 2 × cores); a handful of requests exhausts every I/O thread, after which the gateway/client accepts no further connections and serves no traffic — a complete, persistent DoS that survives until process restart. Availability impact High; no confidentiality/integrity impact.

Adversarial re-reading (attempts to refute)

  • "maxFieldSectionSize caps it." No — the declared length in the PoC is 1; the cap (line 607) checks the declared value only. The spin happens on a 17-byte buffer with no allocation. Refutation fails.
  • "An upstream HTTP size limit / HttpObjectAggregator blocks it." No — the bug is CPU-bound, not memory-bound. The whole malicious message is tiny and well within any size limit. Refutation fails.
  • "This is just CVE-2024-40642 (absent input validation)." No — that advisory was about missing validation of method/scheme/authority/path enabling injection; that fix (the ALLOWED_TOKEN/ALLOWED_SCHEME validators, lines 76-122/461-466) is present and unrelated. This is a control-flow/termination defect in field-section length accounting. Distinct class, distinct code.
  • "The hang might be a harness artifact." No — the thread dump pinpoints readFieldSection:626; CPU≈wall confirms a spin; the -ea control throws at the exact assert; the well-formed control returns. The hang is for the claimed reason.
  • "completeBodyReceived must be true." Not required — the loop is inside readFieldSection, reached via readRequestHead once the control data is present, independent of that flag. The flag only affects a branch taken after readRequestHead returns null, which never happens here.

No concrete blocker survived. Verdict: CONFIRMED.

Remediation

  1. Change the loop exit condition to while (fieldSectionLength > 0) so an overshoot (negative counter) terminates.
  2. Treat a null / zero-progress return from readFieldLine while fieldSectionLength > 0 as a hard framing error — throw CorruptedFrameException("truncated or over-long field line") instead of re-looping.
  3. Reject any field line whose consumed byte count would drive fieldSectionLength below 0 (the declared length must be consumed exactly, per RFC 9292 §3.6).
  4. Do not rely on assert for wire-format invariants on attacker-controlled input; assertions are disabled in production. Promote lines 622/624 to explicit exceptions.

Example:

while (fieldSectionLength > 0) {
    int readableBytes = in.readableBytes();
    lastType = readFieldLine(in, headers, lastType, trailers);
    int read = readableBytes - in.readableBytes();
    if (lastType == null || read <= 0) {
        throw new CorruptedFrameException("truncated or over-long field line");
    }
    if (read > fieldSectionLength) {
        throw new CorruptedFrameException("field line exceeds declared field-section length");
    }
    fieldSectionLength -= read;
}

Notes

  • The indeterminate-length field-section path (framing indicators 2/3) shares the same loop and the same != 0 / zero-progress structure; the fix above should cover both. A dedicated trace of getIndeterminateLength (lines 538-566) under non-default maxFieldSectionSize is recorded separately as a lead.
  • Default maxFieldSectionSize for the OHTTP codecs is 8 * 1024 (OHttpCodecBuilder.DEFAULT_MAX_FIELD_SECTION_SIZE), and is irrelevant to this CPU-bound spin.

References

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 20, 2026
Reviewed Aug 20, 2026
Last updated Aug 20, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource. Learn more on MITRE.

Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-63202

GHSA ID

GHSA-4899-mpch-38p3

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.