Skip to content

Fix the correct return formats for frame endpoints #64

Description

@emelalkim

We need to define the correct return formats for WADO-RS and WADO-URI endpoints for frames and fix them.
Should we use similar format to #63?

WADO Path Return format
WADO-RS frame multipart/related
WADO-URI frame application/dicom (DICOM Part 10)

Are we going to support/respect accept header sent from the client? which types we need to support?
I created this issue to start a discussion to define the best solution. We appreciate any input @pieper, @swederik, @hackermd, @lassoan

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions