⚡ Optimize force-index.cjs with concurrent API requests - #30
Conversation
…g Promise.all Co-authored-by: lsb11 <269203137+lsb11@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Deploying stackarchitect2 with
|
| Latest commit: |
83aa177
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://06e84c19.stackarchitect2.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://optimize-force-index-concurr.stackarchitect2.pages.dev |
1 participant
💡 What: Refactored
forceIndexUrlsinscripts/force-index.cjsto usePromise.allwith anArray.prototype.map()for concurrent API execution instead of a sequentialfor...ofloop. The try-catch blocks were preserved for each individual request.🎯 Why: To improve performance. The original code executed network requests sequentially, waiting for one to resolve before initiating the next. For purely I/O-bound operations like pushing URLs to an indexing API, executing these concurrently drastically reduces total execution time.
📊 Measured Improvement:
A benchmark was created simulating 50 sequential vs concurrent API calls, mocked to take 50ms each.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 1755974111338943198 started by @lsb11