Skip to content

[AutoPR- Security] Patch vitess for CVE-2026-55969, CVE-2026-43871 [HIGH] - #18296

Open
azurelinux-security wants to merge 3 commits into
microsoft:fasttrack/3.0from
azurelinux-security:azure-autosec/vitess/3.0/1174627
Open

[AutoPR- Security] Patch vitess for CVE-2026-55969, CVE-2026-43871 [HIGH]#18296
azurelinux-security wants to merge 3 commits into
microsoft:fasttrack/3.0from
azurelinux-security:azure-autosec/vitess/3.0/1174627

Conversation

@azurelinux-security

@azurelinux-security azurelinux-security commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Auto Patch vitess for CVE-2026-55969, CVE-2026-43871.

Autosec pipeline run -> https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner/_build/results?buildId=1174627&view=results

CVE-2026-55969 : Single Patch Backporter Pipeline Run -> https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner/_build/results?buildId=1174635&view=results
CVE-2026-43871 : Single Patch Backporter Pipeline Run -> https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner/_build/results?buildId=1174634&view=results

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?

Change Log
Does this affect the toolchain?

YES/NO

Associated issues
  • N/A
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology

@v-aaditya

v-aaditya commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CVE-2026-43871

  1. The AI patch completely matches with upstream patch.
  2. Only go module or file changes are included as other variations are not present.

CVE-2026-55969

  1. The changes in files vendor/github.com/uber/jaeger-client-go/thrift/json_protocol.go and vendor/github.com/uber/jaeger-client-go/thrift/protocol_test.go are not included in the patch as they are not present in current thrift source.
  2. The AI patch has been modified to match with upstream patch.
  3. Modification details -
    1. getMinSerializedSize() function has been added as it is used in upstream fix and was not present in current thrift source. Also upstream has case UUID: return 16; and the backport substitutes case UTF8/UTF16: return 4, because jaeger-client-go vendors a pre-UUID Thrift where UUID doesn't exist as a TType but UTF8/UTF16 do.
    2. The backport drops upstream's standalone if size > 0. math.MaxInt32 guard, to match it with upstream.

Buddy Build has been re-triggered. Kindly note the Buddy Build has failed during "Verify Test Results" phase as ptest has been failing and it is unrelated to this PR as it is a known issue and a PR #16642 is already open for the same.

Peer-review completed by Jyoti Kanase.

@v-aaditya

v-aaditya commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Re-triggered Buddy Build after fixing ptest failures and it has passed.
This PR also fixes workitem - https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner/_workitems/edit/18490
Referred PR - #16642

@Kanishk-Bansal
Kanishk-Bansal marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2026 10:55
@Kanishk-Bansal
Kanishk-Bansal requested a review from a team as a code owner August 4, 2026 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants