Skip to content

kata-containers: use smaller vendored tarball - #18314

Draft
Redent0r wants to merge 2 commits into
3.0-devfrom
kata-ci/3-32-tarball
Draft

kata-containers: use smaller vendored tarball#18314
Redent0r wants to merge 2 commits into
3.0-devfrom
kata-ci/3-32-tarball

Conversation

@Redent0r

@Redent0r Redent0r commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Current vendored tarball is ~400Mb and causes issues with ESRP singing.

A smaller tarballl (~100Mb) was produced by [1]:

  • deduplicating rust vendored code
  • removing windows support

bb: https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner/_build/results?buildId=1175221&view=results

[1] https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner/_build/results?buildId=1175335&view=results

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service Bot added Packaging 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels Aug 4, 2026
@Redent0r
Redent0r force-pushed the kata-ci/3-32-tarball branch from 62d3a49 to 0d101e4 Compare August 4, 2026 18:52
Comment thread SPECS/kata-containers/kata-containers.spec

@romoh romoh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left minor comment. Otherwise LGTM

Comment thread SPECS/kata-containers/kata-containers.spec
@Redent0r
Redent0r force-pushed the kata-ci/3-32-tarball branch from 0d101e4 to 8e9398a Compare August 4, 2026 19:17
@Camelron

Camelron commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

LGTM as well.

@Redent0r
Redent0r force-pushed the kata-ci/3-32-tarball branch 2 times, most recently from 50bf0cf to 5237733 Compare August 4, 2026 20:34
@Redent0r
Redent0r force-pushed the kata-ci/3-32-tarball branch from 5237733 to 662dbe6 Compare August 4, 2026 21:29
@Redent0r
Redent0r force-pushed the kata-ci/3-32-tarball branch from 662dbe6 to 9e25752 Compare August 4, 2026 21:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants