Skip to content

Package obs-loki-eio.0.1.0 - #30597

Open
loganbnielsen wants to merge 3 commits into
ocaml:masterfrom
loganbnielsen:opam-publish-obs-loki-eio.0.1.0
Open

loganbnielsen wants to merge 3 commits into
ocaml:masterfrom
loganbnielsen:opam-publish-obs-loki-eio.0.1.0

Conversation

@loganbnielsen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

obs-loki-eio.0.1.0

Loki HTTP push backend for obs-eio
Converts obs-eio span events into structured logfmt log lines and pushes them to
Loki's push API when each span closes. Not a general-purpose Loki client: it is the
Loki backend for obs-eio's Obs_eio.backend interface.



🐫 Pull-request generated by opam-publish v3.0.0

@loganbnielsen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mseri same here, I think if we rerun opam-ci it should pass now

@loganbnielsen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jmid could you run the ci job for me here?

@shonfeder

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Looks like we got a rerun at 2026-09-03 05:10.07 but still failing with

compilers

5.4
obs-loki-eio.0.1.0 (failed: Unbound value Obs_eio.label_name_exn)
5.5
obs-loki-eio.0.1.0 (failed: Unbound value Obs_eio.label_name_exn)

I expect this error result is pretty clear, but let us know if you need help debugging!

Obs_eio.label_name_exn is only present starting obs-eio v0.1.1
(see ocaml#30630); the released obs-eio.0.1.0 predates it, which is why
CI fails with 'Unbound value Obs_eio.label_name_exn'.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HzUg5tzYz7wrhAFnStU1Vh
@loganbnielsen

loganbnielsen commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

(this comment shouldn't have gotten posted, sorry for the noise)

@mseri

mseri commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

obs-eio 0.1.1 has never been released, so this is not installable.

This type of tight compatibility is the reason we tend to release tightly dependent packages together with strict =version dependency requirements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants