There is one pair of biblio files that, although the filenames suggest differently, contain exactly the same content (with whitespace differences though): 97653.xml and 97685.xml. This is a bit inconvenient as it makes the Biblio ID technically non-unique during file traversal. Is there a (historic) reason for this? Is it intended?
There is one pair of biblio files that, although the filenames suggest differently, contain exactly the same content (with whitespace differences though):
97653.xmland97685.xml. This is a bit inconvenient as it makes the Biblio ID technically non-unique during file traversal. Is there a (historic) reason for this? Is it intended?