Skip to content

List of backward incompatible changes that could be made if proposed to packaging #140

Description

@henryiii

I'd like to track the changes that could be made if this is proposed to packaging (#103).

I'd also like to normalize the strings to use f"{value!r}" instead of f'"{value}"', which works better when a value is an int, for example, and more closely matches Python's output. This probably can be done in the main lib, though.

I think the packaging version could use packaging.metadata, and we could instead extend that with writing support?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions