Skip to content

Allow unambiguous inter-molecular crosslinks in restraints #245

Description

@saltzberg

By default, the crosslinking restraints, for all crosslinked residue pairs (r1, r2), will add contributions from all copies of that residue. I.e., for two copies of a molecule (c1 and c2), four contributions are added to the restraint: [c1r1-c1r2], [c1r1-c2r2], [c2r1-c1r2], [c2r1-c2r2]. The restraint is evaluated on the residue pair with the smallest distance.

Certain crosslinks, however, can be unambiguously assigned as intermolecular. Specifically, those crosslinked peptides that have overlapping sequence must come from different macromolecules. It would be nice to be able to flag these type of crosslinks and remove the intra-molecular contributions. This is especially important because, since the two crosslinked residues are likely very close in sequence, they are likely to be satisfied by the intra-molecular contribution.

I think the best way to do this would be:

Utilize the link_type_key and create a conditional in the restraint code that looks for link_type_key=="Interlink" or link_type_key=="Intralink" and creates the appropriate contributions. A link_type_key=="Ambiguouslink" could be used for crosslinks without this information. These keys may have to be manually added to the crosslinking datafile or manually identified in the XLDB. The XLDB code could also automatically detect these overlapping peptides.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions