Is there a reason why both of them are main content types? In paper we ignore them completely.
|
enum ContentType { |
|
// Not specified. |
|
CONTENT_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED = 0; |
|
|
|
// A text article. |
|
ARTICLE = 1; |
|
|
|
// An image article (not available as standalone article). |
|
IMAGE = 2; |
|
|
|
// A video article. |
|
VIDEO = 3; |
|
|
|
// A gallery article. |
|
GALLERY = 4; |
|
|
|
// An embed article including an oembed or edge_side_include element |
|
EMBED = 5; |
|
|
|
// An author article (not available as standalone article). |
|
AUTHOR = 6; |
|
|
|
// An agency article (not available as standalone article). |
|
AGENCY = 7; |
|
} |
Is there a reason why both of them are main content types? In paper we ignore them completely.
tapir/stroeer/core/v1/article.proto
Lines 225 to 249 in ee2c8ae