Skip to content

remark on xarray performances #1

Description

@pjbarjhoux

Dear Pathfinder development team,

First of all, thank you making this model open-source and sharing it with the climate modeling community!

I was doing some experiments on the model and noticed that xarray operations were a bit slow compared to numpy-based operations only (np is 20x faster average).
I thus implemented a POC version of a run_xarray()-like numpy-based method called run_numpy here, if needed:
https://github.com/pjbarjhoux/Pathfinder/blob/0a4768b4fdb0b8440fa553a1644376901148a3d2/core_fct/cls_model.py#L217

with a script running a simple evaluation of the model and compares execution times:
https://github.com/pjbarjhoux/Pathfinder/blob/ft/numpy_operations/run_scripts/run_eval.py

It is not generic enough to cover all Forcings input xarray DataSets structure, but it should work if they are modified to match the implementation (eg. the case of Forcings with shapes (years, scenario) is not handled but could work if transformed as (years, scenario, config)). One of xarray's strengths is indeed its ability to perform extended broadcasting operations over named dimensions, a feature not available in NumPy. While the proposed implementation already covers many cases, there is still room for improvement if a more generic approach is preferred.

Regards
Pierre-Jean

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions