Specification for a reproducible, provenance-bound multi-lane LLM benchmark suite.
-
Updated
Oct 16, 2026 - Python
Specification for a reproducible, provenance-bound multi-lane LLM benchmark suite.
What 200 steps of fully simulated multi-turn tool-use RL do to a 4B policy: every 10th checkpoint scored on BFCL v4, with the pipeline that produced the measurement.
Public benchmark harnesses and reproducible evaluations from PixelSpaceAI
Pre-generation tool-call gating via linear probes on LLM hidden states. F1 ≈ 0.91–0.94 on BFCL v4, 14–22× faster than full generation. Cross-architecture transfer across Llama / Qwen / Phi / Mistral (3B–7B) with ≥96% retention.
Think only when the tool call looks unsure: confidence-gated reasoning for small local models. Code, BFCL results and paper.
Canonical IR, schema validation, and deterministic delivery for function calls.
A bf16 LoRA fine-tune of Qwen 3.5 4B for function calling on xLAM. v1.0 ships below the BFCL gate with full per-category failure analysis.
Reproducible LoRA SFT of Qwen3-4B-Base for tool calling on 2x RTX 4090: assistant-only loss + selective special-token LoRA (810M to 66M trainable), 124k-sample pool, decontamination, 3 eval suites incl. BFCL v4 subset. Strict protocol success 1.8% -> 35.0%.
Paired metamorphic evaluation of tool-calling robustness under realistic user phrasing, built on BFCL.
Open LLM leaderboard featuring Xiaomi MiMo v2.5 & MiMo 100T head-to-head with GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Llama 4. ARC-AGI · SWE-Bench · MMLU-Pro · GPQA · HumanEval · BFCL.
Task-conditioned tail reliability for tool-using agents under equivalent interfaces
Self-hosted LLM evaluation lab: MMLU-Pro / BFCL / IFEval / LiveCodeBench / HumanEval+ runs on Tesla V100 and RTX 3090, llama.cpp serving (incl. Volta sm_70), patched API benchmark clients
Does quantization break tool calling? 10,800 graded agent tasks: it depends which Gemma 4 you compress. The 26B MoE stays flat down to 2 bits, the dense 12B collapses, and no static benchmark reveals it.
Independent audit of a fine-tuned LLM tool-calling PoC — BFCL regression decomposition, inference stack risk assessment, and production recommendation for a FinTech client. Qwen-2.5, LoRA, SGLang, H100.
面向工具调用的大模型后训练与泛化评测系统。 End-to-end tool-calling LLM post-training pipeline with data auditing, QLoRA SFT, grounded on-policy DPO, strict evaluation and BFCL.
QLoRA fine-tune of Qwen2.5-1.5B for tool calling on one 8 GiB GPU, scored locally on BFCL v4 tasks: up to +8.5 points on call categories, -55 points on declining. Replacing 1,200 call examples with refusals recovers ~49 of those (3 seeds; irrelevance still 5-9 points below base). Appending them instead ends +4.1 points over base overall.
OpenEuroLLM snapshot of the Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard evaluation harness and OLMo evaluation orchestration.
To associate your repository with the bfcl topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."