Skip to content

seq: point the caret at the failing part of a format - #14013

Open
sylvestre wants to merge 1 commit into
caret-odfrom
caret-seq
Open

seq: point the caret at the failing part of a format#14013
sylvestre wants to merge 1 commit into
caret-odfrom
caret-seq

Conversation

@sylvestre

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Stack created with GitHub Stacks CLIGive Feedback 💬

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 18, 2026 20:59

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/tail-n0f (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 4.79%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 56 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 350 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation du_wide_tree[(5000, 500)] 19.1 ms 20.1 ms -4.79%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing caret-seq (7e3d1f5) with caret-od (7ee143f)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 350 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on caret-od (f2987b5) during the generation of this report, so 29ff3df was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 19, 2026 10:32

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@sylvestre
sylvestre force-pushed the caret-seq branch 2 times, most recently from 7e3d1f5 to b886beb Compare August 19, 2026 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants