docs: document Desktop flows in Core - #35
Closed
ovvesley wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
This was referenced Sep 12, 2026
Collaborator
Author
|
Encerrada por decisão explícita do mantenedor. A proposta atual foi descartada e não deve ser mergeada. As branches foram preservadas apenas para recuperação histórica; qualquer retomada deve começar em nova issue/PR com escopo revisado. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This stacked PR extends #33 and addresses Paperclip AKO-22 under AKO-21. It contains no Desktop repository changes, product harness, API change, merge, or release.
Verification
/usr/local/bin/go test ./...npm run typecheck --prefix docsnpm run build --prefix docsnpm run check:links --prefix docsgit diff --checkGET /akoflow-api/instance/returned 200)Evidence and risk
The accepted 1280x860 onboarding image contains no hostname, credentials, or unstable IDs. A working Overview candidate was deliberately rejected because the footer exposed the hostname-derived daemon identity. Dependency audit warnings are pre-existing and unchanged.